Organisations Positions on Euthanasia
World Medical Association position on euthanasia (opposed)
-
Recent Posts
Archives
Categories
Meta
- Home
- Answering
- Articles
- A medical view on euthanasia (Dr Allan Donkin)
- Bioethics (Tom Angier)
- Conscientious objection
- Disability rights (Judy van Aardt)
- End of Life Decisions (Dr Jon Larsen)
- Euthanasia – Mercy Killing (Dr Claude Newbury)
- How do we answer calls to legalise euthanasia
- Is there a place for mercy killing (Michael Cassidy)
- Ask opponents
- Blog
- Contact us
- Get help
- Glossary
- Help us
- Journalists
- Judicial abuse
- Listen
- Network
- News
- Parliament
- Polls
- Positions
- Resources
- SALRC
- Slippery slope
- Abortion, Euthanasia, Infanticide
- Answering David Benatars ‘Slippery Slope’ defence
- Comparison of Dutch & Nazi German euthanasia programmes (Dr John Larsen)
- Foreign abuses
- Letter to the editor of the SAMJ 24 April 2014 (Dr Jon Larsen)
- Nazi German vs South African euthanasia movements
- Risks to the disabled
- SA euthanasia lobby radicalising
- Stransham-Ford case
- 0 Key legal documents in the Stransham-Ford case
- 1 Why Judge Fabricius was wrong
- 1.1 Errors in the Fabricius Judgement
- 1.2 Constitutional irregularities
- 1.3 Errors in the applicants founding affidavit (treated as correct)
- 1.4 The history of the applicants in abusing the law & ethics
- 1.5 Procedural decisions favour euthanasia lobby group
- 1.6 Manufactured & reckless urgency
- 2.1 Supreme Court of Appeal says Fabricius was wrong on Euthanasia
- 2.2 Why Dignity SA has no hope of appealing the Stransham-Ford case
- Failure to notify opposition
- Manipulating urgency & time frames
- Medical affidavit (by Dr Allan Donkin)
- Stransham-Ford affidavit cites outdated first draft SALRC Bill
- Tweets from the Stransham-Ford Gauteng High Court case
- Why urgent trial was unreasonable